So if I just follow the same process I would for a typical final wave file with maybe a db of allowance, get what I should expect. Witch uses the "lame" encoder if I remember right.Appreciate it. However, the artist has the option of allowing downloads, which can be in a variety of different qualities. Witch uses the "lame" encoder if I remember right.Īlso some daw's are better at mp3 encoding than others, I normally use reaper and I have had good results so far. Answer (1 of 9): As Jonathan Pister mentions, they stream tracks in 128kbps. but most importantly trust your ears.Īlso some daw's are better at mp3 encoding than others, I normally use reaper and I have had good results so far. Null test can help to see if the change is dramatic and witch frequencys are effected. see what has changed and adjust accordingly. When rendering, just try a few low bit rate mp3s and compare with the cd quality. When reducing the bit rate the high frequency range is affected the most dramatically because simply put its being reduced more than other frequencies. with most music it just causes a grainier sound. some types of music the high frequency can be dramatically effected. if your target volume is loud with -.05 peaks and there is lots of compression the mp3 may distort. There is no repeatable answer other than head room before mp3 encoding helps. but the dynamic range is audibly reduced as well. 3 - 1db of volume and compression to the song. Generally the mp3 encoding process literally adds.
Back off the compression a bit and render the file with 1-1.5db headroom.(peaking -1 to -1.5db) Well most importantly headroom and compression.
0 kommentar(er)
